NOTE 007824
DATEDecember 13, 1988
STATUSFiled
SUBJECTSwiffer Sweeper Review: The

The disposable pads create waste, which is a legitimate environmental concern if you’re using the product frequently. Consider it a supplement to traditional mopping rather than a complete replacement to minimize your impact.We bought the Swiffer Sweeper on a Tuesday morning after the dog tracked something unspeakable across the kitchen tile, and I stood there thinking, “I could get the full-size mop. Or I could try the thing that looks like it was designed by someone who understands that I am tired.” Dad was skeptical. He has sold things for a living and knows when a box is prettier than what’s inside it. Mom, who had not yet entered the kitchen and therefore did not yet know about the unspeakable thing, remained neutral—which in our house is practically an endorsement.The Swiffer box arrived promising that fresh, lemony-clean scent that makes you feel like you have your life together, even when you’re using it to cover up the evidence that you don’t. I opened it with mild hope, the way you open anything that promises to make your life easier. Dad immediately examined the packaging, the weight of the materials, the way the handle clicked together. “Marketing,” he muttered. Then he smelled the pads. There was a pause. “That’s… not terrible,” he said, which from a former door-to-door salesman is basically a sonnet.Here’s what we needed to know: would this thing actually smell like the commercials suggested, or would it smell like a legally distinct lemon-adjacent chemical that costs three dollars a pad?

And more importantly, would it work well enough that I’d stop feeling guilty about the weeks between actual mopping

Report 007824. Filed.



Meetsparkles